Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
2.
Acad Pediatr ; 21(1): 109-116, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044465

OBJECTIVE: A predischarge car seat tolerance screen (CSTS) is currently recommended for all infants born prematurely in the United States to monitor for adverse cardiorespiratory events while in the semi-upright car seat. However, specific guidelines for failure criteria, timing of testing, and follow-up of failed CSTS do not exist. Our objective was to perform a national survey of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in order to identify common features and variation in CSTS protocols. METHODS: We surveyed Level II-IV NICUs representing all 50 states to determine whether each performed CSTS, inclusion and failure criteria, timing of CSTS prior to discharge and in relation to feeds, follow-up of initial and subsequent CSTS failures, use of car beds, and outpatient referrals after failed CSTS. RESULTS: Of the 199 NICUs surveyed, 96.5% perform a CSTS. The most common failure saturation cutoff was <90%, but values ranged from <80% to <92%. The most common failure bradycardia definition was <80 bpm but ranged from <70 bpm to <100 bpm. After an initial failed CSTS, 86.5% will perform a repeat CSTS after a period of observation that ranged from <12 hours to 3 or more days. When discharging in a car bed, 20% do not routinely perform a car bed test, and >70% refer only to the primary care physician for car bed follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread implementation, significant variation exists in CSTS protocols and follow-up after NICU discharge. A stronger evidence base is needed to define appropriate testing parameters and inform more explicit guidelines.


Child Restraint Systems , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Apnea , Bradycardia/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , United States
...